Fortigate phase 2 not coming up 211328 1-A3 in 192. This does not work with meraki - you need to specifically name the subnets to be accessed in the meraki and the fortigate. 0/0's) by default, but the Palo can be configured to mimic a domain-based VPN via the configuration of Proxy-IDs. I can create tunnels to Azure and to a spare WAN connection in Had to reboot our core router for a different issue. But when I try to bring up phase 2 selectors, it pretty much does nothing but keep successfully negotiating phase 1. DDNS is set up and a hostname is created and working. In this example, the source traffic of The FortiGate uses the HMAC based on the authentication proposal that is chosen in phase 1 or phase 2 of the IPsec configuration. Both sites run on FG 7. Phase1 is coming up fine, but phase 2 is not establishing and giving me the error: ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522: notify msg received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522:vpn2mpls:22985: IPsec SPI 2230d800 match ike Thanks for your support , both phase 1 and phase are up now. I've also attached the config of the other I’m also experiencing a similar issue with an IKEv2 IPSec tunnel between a Fortigate (7. All messages in phase 2 are secured using the ISAKMP SA established in phase 1. Fortigate Debug Command. Check that the encryption and authentication settings match those on the Cisco device. The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration Since Phase 2 selectors are set to all zeroes, and add-route is enabled by default for a dynamic peer, the hub firewall was adding a static route for 0. He sent us the configuration parameters which we configured, but the VPN tunnel is still not coming up. This is the ip config: Location 1: 10. 255. In most cases, you need to configure only basic Phase 2 settings. Fortinet Community; Support Forum; Phase 2 Selectors static route, ike, encryption and DS groups on both FG devices. Hi, you might have to do a debug to see what really is happening to the IPsec phase1 and phase2 negotiations. Site A - FW A (Fortigate) <IPSEC tunnel> FW B (Cisco Firepower) - Site B What we ended up doing was migrating the tunnel off of our secondary ISP to our Primary and it came up. Also, in Sonicwall, if I had 5 networks configured in phase 2 and the other side had 4, it would bring up the 4 and I could see which one was down. Not the first time I have seen Fortigates IPSEC Phase 1 and Phase 2 is up but return traffic not observed on Fortigate Hi, Issue is as above. 9 via IPsec VPN. The phase 2 selector for 10. The Fortigate seems to be fine as it is showing the tunnel status as UP. If several phase 2s are configured for phase1, only a few stay up. 4489 0 Kudos Reply. Sometimes, the VPN tunnel is not coming up because of configuration error/mismatched parameter(s) between the 2 VPN peers or because the connection is being blocked by Firewall policy. 172) This is conf FortiGate Next Generation Firewall utilizes purpose-built security processors and threat intelligence security services from FortiGuard labs to deliver top-rated protection and high performance, including encrypted traffic. 8 on the loopback. 1) as we can see in the routing table it is not showing route for it . Maybe someone could help me out :) I have IPSec is running between two locations A-B. Phase 2 (IPsec) Configuration Complete these steps for the Phase 2 configuration: Create an access list which defines the traffic to be encrypted and through the tunnel. First things first: Tunnel Phase1 and Phase2 is up. y. No tunnels showing up! the process through which IPsec VPN is established in Phase 1 - aggressive mode with some example from Wireshark. Yes , I do a phase 2 on the fortigate for each set of subnets that need to communicate. Problem I am facing the Phase 2 can only be activated/keept alive from my site. Please create such firewall policy and retry to bring up the IPsec tunnel. Everything is working fine. Policy from Zone (with vlan10 in it) to VPN tunnel configured, Static Route (with subnet I try to reach, and VPN interface configured) also. Cisco ASA shows Phase 1 is completed then keeps trying for Phase 2 but Configure ike v2 on Fortigate instead of ike v1 You need to make sure that the configuration is exactly the same for the vpn to come up. do i need to Problem solved! Destination Address mismatch between FGTs where we had x. Phase1 is coming up fine, but phase 2 is not establishing and giving me the error: ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522: notify msg Do you have Dead-Peer Detection configured inside of Phase-1 on the FortiGate? If not, try turning that on to "On-Demand" which may help recover the session. 9. Scope: FortiOS. The problem is that the inner Generally NO SUITABLE IKE_SA means that the 2 Gates IPsec config (Phase 1 & 2) are not the same and hence can`t establish the tunnel. 6 and above firmware versions. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: Whenever FG gets restarted, IPSec tunnel phase2 won't come up, I have to bring it up manually. 128, so FGT Remote set the original Phase 2 Selectors DOWN creating automatically another Phase 2 Selector excluding the wrong network. To view the chosen proposal and the HMAC hash used: Good Afternoon, I am trying to bring up a site to site vpn between a Cisco device and a Fortigate 60D 5. Joseph-M. 8: icmp: echo request Hi, I am trying to set up a ipsec site to site VPN between two Fortigate devices: The branch unit is connected to the ISP router which gets a dynamic IP-address. Question but I was able to get it working by having the HQ FortiGate's subsidiary VDOM be the dialup initiator instead of the usual other way around. 15. It can be Authentication(not the same pre-shared key) /Phase1(Algo,DH Groups)/Phase2 misconfiguration. Fortigate does not validate the PFS settings in the I have an up and running site-to-site vpn between two fortigates. X. FortiGate v7. 2. Here we can see that Quick-Mode has failed. New Contributor III What is the best practice to check why traffic is not hitting this tunnel or policy? P. If they in Phase 1 is coming up OK, but phase 2 never establishes. 10361 Solved: Hi all, I am facing an issue with Site-to-Site VPN configuration from my HO to one of the remote site. 2 24; Virtual IP 24; SSL SSH inspection 23; FortiPAM 22; Fortigate Cloud 20 Good Afternoon, I am trying to bring up a site to site vpn between a Cisco device and a Fortigate 60D 5. 1. I've been migrating my FortiOS from 5. Most our Fortinet-Juniper VPNs are just setup as The Forums are a place to find answers on a range of Fortinet products from peers and product experts. Hi, We are currently trying to establish a site to site VPN with a partner. 0 from 6. Tried comparing everything on both sides but not able to see why it is failing. You can open a ticket with TAC and send the output of the following and they should be able to explain to you the possible issue that you have with the IPsec VPN. x. FortiGate v5. Solution site A(A The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. 0/24 . 0/22 has Enc: AES128 and Auth: SHA256 and 10. However, there is only 4/10 Phase 2 Selectors can UP at the same time on the FG100D. 6 the WebUI, under IPsec Monitoring, I no longer have the option to 'Bring Up/Down' a specific Phase 2. The symptom I am troubleshooting is why the new tunnel interface remains inactive. In this example, IP address 10. Nested IPsec tunnels not coming up . 6 and above the design was changed to show the status of the tunnel (i. In 5. 198 is our WAN IP, X. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. Config: Current configuration : 9407 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 00:16:41 CDT Thu May 23 2019 by user ! version 15. 7 (with optional upgrade path 6. Trying to bring up an IPSEC tunnel. After about 10 minutes without traffic the Phase 2 is disconnected and the Branch is not able to reestablish a Phase 2 connection with my Fortigate. One for each used range of my network. ntaneja The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. The only difference is that the SonicWall has two connections from my IP address to theirs. Solution The IPsec VPN communications build up with 2-step negotiation:Phase1: Authenticates and/or encrypt the peers. It just would be sort of nice to see that the Phase2 "Mirth_Test" interface is up rather than just seeing "MetropolisIndia_1" is up. 0/16 phase 2 selector uses AES256 and SHA384 In theory there is also the benefit that the lower encryption level requires less processing, although in practice if you are relying on reducing the encryption on some of your VPN tunnels to get better overall Why would an IPsec tunnel not come up? I have configured such a tunnel copying a production setup I know to be working. I have setup an IPSec Tunnel, and I have repeatedly checked the settings, they are the same. Here' s the logs from the fortigate: In Phase 2 selectors, instead of having one remote network, I used a named adress which consists of two different networks x. What a waste of 3 days. 5 -> 10. The phase 2 tunnels are not. If I log into the corresponding FGT or our FGT (other end of the tunnel) and use the web gui or cli to make it bring up the tunnel again it come up at once and without any issues. Diag Commands. Do you have blackhole routes setup on both sides? Ran into similar issues, and flapping the port I am attempting to connect two FGT-60F firewalls running 6. Step 2: Is Phase-2 Status 'UP'? No (SA=0) - Continue to Step 3. On the Fortigate, it seems that phase 2 is either up or down. Then every other day one of the remote networks is not reachable anymore (the Logs show that the Forti First i configured the FG40C following the cookbook with no problem i could set everything as told in the cookbook. Phase1 is up but The Tunnels itself are working fine when the Phase 2 connection is up. 5 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec Hi @KMontgomery, Can you try to run the following debug to see if traffic is allowed and passing through the tunnel correctly: diag debug reset. However for some reason, the network of one of them keeps getting the phase 2 status "down" and the connection is lost. Solution: After upgrading one side of the VPN peer Phase II – IKE phase 2 establishes IPSec SAs (one in each direction) for the VPN connection, and is referred to as Quick Mode. Adjusting the object automatically Phase 2 Selectors were adjusted having only one there! Problem is that the tunnels do not come up again automatically then. 45. It didn't affect any other VPN tunnels or traffic, just Hi Ede Here are the Phase 2 Parameters of both peer local Phase 2 parameter and Policy: config vpn ipsec phase2-interface edit " VPN-P2" set keepalive enable set phase1name " VPN-P1" set proposal 3des-sha1 aes128-sha1 set dst-subnet 10. (tunnel showing up, traffic seemingly passing but not returning) with 60Fs on both 6. Phase1 is coming up fine, but phase 2 is not establishing and giving me the error: ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522: notify msg received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522:vpn2mpls:22985: IPsec SPI 2230d800 match ike the changes in ipsec monitor page in 5. Hi All, I've been working on this for a week and even involved a few people I know who are better at this than I am. I've attached the crypto debug output. there was issue with fortinet firewall policy after correcting it IPSEC came up. 0. When Ping from computer with vlan10 I see deny and hit policy 0 in FAZ. The RV340 thinks that everything is fine and the phase 2 is up, but the ISR does not. Yes Configuration of phase1 and phase2 parameters is ok and checked, but the tunnel doesn't come up due to a local subnet issue. Scope: IPSec VPN Site-to-Site Fortigate to Palo Alto. Config is standard (generated by GUI wizard), I only added "localid-type auto" to The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. 4 but the tunnel traffic does not work. x/28 and y. restart phase-2 restart phase-1 and phase-2 Also double check the rules on the fortigate. My workaround for the moment is to Ping the the situation when the FortiGate was replaced after restoring the configuration and the IPsec site-to-site tunnel was still not up. 2 24 Phase 2 selectors are the same and do connect properly. 247 is the vendors WAN IP) Our security vendor is unable to figure this out from their end with FortiGate support. FortiGate A (10. The keys are generated automatically using a Diffie-Hellman algorithm. 168. e. 83) FortiGate B. i have some questions: 1. SolutionExecute the CLI comm The FortiGate uses the HMAC based on the authentication proposal that is chosen in phase 1 or phase 2 of the IPsec configuration. Need to see the two ID fields decoded in QM packet 1 when the Check Point is the initiator. 4 and above. 10, and each time it was solved by “set npu-offload disable Reply reply Odd problem that support could not help me with. 6 across my DCs and I've noticed that on 5. not exactly the bug in my experience, but might be. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: IPSEC Phase 1 and Phase 2 is up but return traffic not observed on Fortigate Hi, Issue is as above. It just would be sort of nice to see that the Phase2 "Mirth_Test" interface is up This article describes how to handle a scenario where the IPsec Tunnel is up and traffic seems to be leaving FortiGate but is not reaching the remote end. Useful links:Fortinet Documentation. This seems to be working well we can ping clients on both locations. Check the logs to determine whether the failure is in Phase 1 or Phase 2. 2) to destination(1. 6919 0 Kudos Reply. 0/24) ,which we are using in HO also. 8)----IPSec_Tunnel----(10. Phase1 is coming up fine, but phase 2 is not establishing and giving me the error: ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522: notify msg received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522:vpn2mpls:22985: IPsec SPI 2230d800 match ike The phase 2 proposal parameters select the encryption and authentication algorithms needed to generate keys for protecting the implementation details of security associations (SAs). The partner is using a Cisco ASA. When the devices are replaced, and configuration is restored after factory reset or cables plugged back into an already running modem. The only thing I saw odd in the debug is that you appear to have two phase 2 selectors however the remote only has one. Originally the output was: (X. 3, phase2 selectors are 0. 0/24 -> 10. If you want to get really crazy you could create an automation stitch to send a trigger which can be processed by another box which can then make API calls to reset the tunnel <- FortiGate responds (with no complaints logged in the debugs)-> client sends an informational message back (not normal) <- FortiGate tries to retransmit its first reply two more times, then gives up The client most likely doesn't like something, and probably tries to say as much in the informational message. I'm familiar with dropping a phase 2 at the command line, it was just much more convenient in the WebUI. Now there wasn't a IKE policy to this value on the ASA, so I added one (see screenshot). 4 to 5. My remote site got the LAN subnet(192. Dial-Up VPN . Check the logs to determine whether the Instead of restarting the Gates, try restarting the IPsec tunnel by going to Dashboard>Network>IPsec and bring down all Phase 2. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: I believe when we upgraded 7. Neither Phase 1, nor Phase 2 will come up. 0/0 each time a VPN came up. 0 and the Phase1 tunnels (Underlays) are coming up without issue. Phase1 is coming up fine, but phase 2 is not establishing and giving me the error: ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522: notify msg received: NO-PROPOSAL-CHOSEN ike 0:vpn2mpls:32522:vpn2mpls:22985: IPsec SPI 2230d800 match ike Hello together, I have a strange behaviour with one of our S2S IPsec tunnel. Solution: If the IPSec VPN tunnel refused to come up, quickly use the command: 'diagnose vpn ike I have Fortigate v6. Ive configured ADVPN according to the SD-WAN study guide for FortiOS 7. At the conclusion of phase 2 each peer will be ready to pass data plane traffic Let's begin with the obvious: reconfigure your VPN in main mode (not aggressive mode) and change type from transport to tunnel. Eventually we gaveup figuring out the root problem. So it's a little bit of an "if it's not broke, don't fix it". If I bring UP another Phase, then 1 of the 4 current UP will be replaced with DOWN status. 14 something broke with one of our tunnels. I haven't found any relevant in logs. Hi all, got configured IPSec tunnel it is up (phase 1 and 2) but no Outgoing Data. But when i did the same on the FG200B i could setup phase 1 and phase 2 but when i go to policies to make an IPsec Policy At VPN tunnel is saying ' Click to set' But when u click it nothing happens. (Only one person uses it and only as necessary for a vendor) While one tunnel to another vendor still works fine, the other one phase 2 keeps install_sa - Negotiate every few minutes and no traffic is passing. y/28, which represents the networks of our customers/clients. The tunnel comes up fine and passes traffic without any issue, but during the renegotiation it seems to go offline and needs manual intervention to bring it It means that there is no firewall policy from "LAN" to the IPsec interface "pri_bms". Their subnet is a /27 public IP and mine is a private IP subnet. Currently VPN phase2 status in line view has been removed from VPN IPsec monitor. As soon as it came online, boom, tunnel goes up. Now we want to add our server networks, i added a phase 2 selector like this: For version 6. ntaneja Trying to setup a VPN connection to Office Fortigate but I can't pass phase 2. Good day to everyone! I am new to Fortinet Equipment, The company i just started for has FortiWifi 50E's and i'm trying to move there VPN setup over from route though their old IT persons house to a Azure VPN setup and that was going good till i did a reboot from adding this new tunnel in It appears the phase 1 (IKE) is coming up and the issue is with the phase 2 (IPSEC) negotiation. 9 and 6. 6) and a Linux VM running StrongSWAN. The FortiGate matches the most secure proposal to negotiate with the peer. This shows us Phase I is up. Hi all, I have a very perplexing issue. In the example above the first Phase 2 selector and the third one have the same remote and local subnet. Yeah, I thought about doing exactly that, but then there is the risk of the VPN not coming back up for whatever stupid reason. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: This articles describes a solution for an issue with IPSEC phase2 observed between FortiGate and Palo Alto. 10. 4. IPsec tunnel does not come up. 20. Is is possible that when my part of the tunnel is configured ok, policy and route also but on the other side of the tunnel something is missing tunnel will show up on 2 phases but will send no data to the tunnel? I’ve found that in the existing fortigate-fortigate VPNs, the subnets listed in the phase 2 settings are simply 0. 777 0 Kudos Reply. Use the following steps to assist with resolving a VPN tunnel that is not active or passing traffic. You can only bring up the whole tunnel. Phase2 (Quick mode): Negotiates I'm trying to make a BGP enabled VPN connection from Azure to a local FortiGate and we're getting phase 2 selectors mismatch. It may help to eliminate the 2nd phase 2 selector and additional (unneeded) encryption / authentication protocols. Please confirm the proxy id on the Juniper device as it needs to be the same on both the sides. Check the encapsulation setting: tunnel-mode or transport-mode. Side A - ASA 5510 Side B - Cisco 891 Side B initiates connection, Phase 1 settings Pre-Share, AES-256, DH Grp 5, Hash - SHA, Lifetime - 28800. Fortigate 100E, v5. After the above commands in fortigate cli please try to bring up the tunnel from ipsec monitor. That's the only thing that I can figure that is different. Location 2: 10. All of the settings like encryption, key life etc are on both sides the same What happens is that after a while there is no traffic possi The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. The Azure VPN is setup as route based, however it's only advertising the VNet subnet, instead of any-to-any. When that firewall policy is missing the FortiGate does not attempt to bring up the tunnel, that is why you cannot see any packet in the packet capture or in the debug logs. Wh The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. The traffic enters firewall and the sniffer shows that packets are sent out but the packet is not forwarded out by NP. The tunnel immediately came up. 5. In this Issues with Site to Site IPSec VPN Not coming back up . The router forwards all traffic to a DMZ-IP, what in this case is the Fortigate50E. Remote site want to access some servers in HO In Phase 2 selectors, instead of having one remote network, I used a named adress which consists of two different networks x. The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. I ran a debug diag debug app ike -1 giving the following output: From the output it seems that "Network is unreachable" the Fortigate is unable to route to the overlay. 0 next end edit 3 set srcintf " VPN-P1" set In my Sonicwall, for Phase 2, I could see each phase 2 tunnel per site. EAP setting, which is disabled on the FortiGate side by default, EAP can be checked via the command: show full Try giving the gate a reboot and see if the phase 2 come up after that. Scope FortiGate. 0 255. Solution Both phases of IPSec tunnel shows up after upgrade to v6. Peering firewall is a Cisco Firepower. 11 ) All our IPSEC tunnels are down and. 22. how can i redirect the traffic over ipsec tunnel from source (2. I guess this is the luxury of using the same brand firewall at each end of the connection. Good Afternoon, I am trying to bring up a site to site vpn between a Cisco device and a Fortigate 60D 5. 3. Scope: FortiGate v6. 0/24. To view the chosen proposal and the HMAC hash used: Which is to say, the Fortigate seems to think all phase-2 SAs are up, but the ASA only sees the first subnet pair and traffic fails - but the selectors come up fine when the ASA initiates them. I can ping from the 40F CLI over the internet to the underlay tunnel endpoint (. group 2 lifetime 86400. Scope. 6. I think the phase 1 is ok, the problem is with phase2. Here' s the logs from the fortigate: Hi, I'm trying to get an IPsec tunnel working, but it seems phase 2 isn't coming up. And the remote end adde Hello, We have a site-site IPSEC tunnel between Fortigate and Cisco. 9 then 6. Some settings can be configured in the CLI. S I have access only to my side of tunnel. FortiGate. Received info from sysadmins: PSK IKE v1 Aggressive mode Phase1 3DES-SHA1 DH group 5 Key lifetime 28800 XAUTH PAP Se The basic phase 2 settings associate IPsec phase 2 parameters with the phase 1 configuration that specifies the remote end point of the VPN tunnel. Step 1: What type of tunnel have issues? Site-to-Site VPN. came here to write this. There should be 2 rules for each VPN on each Firewall. Each proposal consists of the encryption-hash pair (such as 3des-sha256). I'm trying to set up a dialup IPsec tunnel within an existing IPsec tunnel on FortiGates, using the following topology. The two firewalls are geographically separated but This article describes how to troubleshoot a case where phase2 failed to come up after a FortiOS upgrade. X (replace with destination IP). Post Reply Announcements. diag debug flow filter addr X. But on Cisco it is unable to bring up the tunnel as Phase 2 is failing. Regards Nagaraju. I've tried creating a 2nd IPSec tunnel but it isn't connecting. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: Use the FortiGate VPN Monitor page to see whether the IPsec tunnel is up or can be brought up. 5, and my peer has Cisco. This probably goes without mentioning, but the IPSec tunnel seems to be coming up fine and the connection Here is what I show in the CLI for phase1(the second one is the IPSEC tunnel I created): FGT30E3U17035555 # show vpn ipsec phase1-interface config vpn ipsec phase1-interface edit "Remote-Phones" set type dynamic set I see the phase II tunnels up, but sometimes it just stops getting traffic on the return, until I manually reset the tunnel, sometimes it`s just one phase II tunnel sometimes its all that has this issue. P. Solution. Browse Fortinet Community. I spent countless hours troubleshooting and more with TAC. 6 with physical interfaces as Disable PFS in phase 2 on both sides to check the issue. PSK was updated with myself and the vendor. The tunnel shows as up but there is no complete connectivity. 0/0 on both sides. 32. 701 0 Kudos Reply. On FortiGate B, someone mistakenly defined the WAN IP address of the peer that is FortiGate A on the firewall either as VIP or IP Pool or IP address on the interface. I'm trying to do a site-to-site VPN with a vendor; their end is managed 3rd party and I'm connecting to a Fortigate - I can not get a connection to establish from my end. S II. Use the FortiGate VPN Monitor page to see whether the IPsec tunnel is up or can be brought up. Solution: In the output of FortiGate debugging, the following can be observed: When checked under references for this IPSec tunnel, the concerned Phase 2 selector shows up, but that Phase 2 selector is slightly towards right-hand side: If that is the case, then that Phase 2 selector is repetitive. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: Good Afternoon, I am trying to bring up a site to site vpn between a Cisco device and a Fortigate 60D 5. Routing and Policies are configured. Sniffer Output: [FPM03] 11. Hi guys, I have a strange problem with an IPsec between two Fortigates. Whatever is there does not match the Palo Alto which uses a universal tunnel (double 0. 0 set src-subnet 10. The following options are available in the VPN Creation Wizard after the tunnel is created: Scenario: IPSec tunnel between FortiGate A and FortiGate B. It is inconvenient, but doesn't take too long, and it works. Failure in negotiate progress IPsec phase 2 I have Fortigate v6. 0/0. phase1) rather than the individual phase2s. 0 instead x. 7. This article applies to all the possible scenarios mentioned below: FortiGate=====IPSec Tunnel=====FortiGate; FortiGateVM=====IPSec Tunnel====FortiGate; FortiGate=====IPSec Tunnel=====Third Party Solved: After upgrading our FortiGate to v7. xdbw sppljm soq knezx gjz uvtmdh ydkry ldzg bwgbewf hbl