Civ 5 leaders reddit. Or adding the Manchus with any of the first four leaders.

Civ 5 leaders reddit 40 votes, 31 comments. Counterintuitively, he's also one of the best leaders for going wide. Votes are distributed for each civilization, each city-state and one extra vote for building the UN. 70K subscribers in the civ5 community. 122 votes, 29 comments. . By denouncing a civ, it forces every other civ with a relationship with one or both of you to take a side. Or adding the Manchus with any of the first four leaders. The game a started a few days ago I'm about to win via tourism, just gonna take out them damned Netherlands first!! Oh, the Celts are a good civ. But Civ 5’s art style completely captures the vibe of being an absolute ruler of a whole civilization and making your marks on the world. 16 votes, 13 comments. This list rounds it down. Having the Civ 5-style Promotion heal is a great way to stay on the offense, and your free Comandante Generals alongside regular Great Generals is an overwhelming power advantage. I'm unsure what you mean by building a default new civ. The Expansionist Civs: America, Shoshone, Iroquois, China, Poland, etc. 16 votes, 18 comments. I'll start with a few (balance and usefulness have been somewhat ignored): Hugo Chávez. I will fight anyone on the Inca being #1. In the base game, any leader with Cavalry will probably be the best. For example: Certain leaders like Montezuma just don't care about warmongering at all and some leaders hate war. With how ridiculously early you get your pantheon, "God King" can be very valuable, but I enjoy +Culture and +Food options like "God of the Open Skies," "Oral Tradition," and "Sun God. The grievance-system of CIV 6 is too general, every leader acts the same and is the same. Also… 46 votes, 10 comments. Chu-Ko-Nus are probably one of the most broken units in the game and the Paper Makers give you both science and gold. My top 10 in order: Inca, Poland, Babylon, Korea, Shoshone, England, Egypt, Russia, Austria, Aztec. Weakness is that he's paranoid and will not work diplomatically with others. The pathfinders are great for quick early game exploration and they're pretty tough too. (2) With Civ 5 the Leader textures could not even be opened so even reskinning existing Leaders was very difficult. 69K subscribers in the civ5 community. reading this guide while at work now and can't wait to finish up so I can get back home and try it out. My cities are always quick to expand and I love the logo design the game uses for the civilization. This is a timeline ranging from ~1300 BC to 2000 AD with each Civ V leader's lifetime plotted. Their extra Faith-generation allows you to still found a religion with some less common pantheon beliefs. Around something like 6 pops (which every city, even in a wide empire, should hit), each city's unhappiness will be permanently lower than a regular civ. AI's personalties are much more complex in CIV 5. Show off your Crusade Forces, rosters, thematic model conversions, share battle reports and discuss new 40k narrative system! Exactly what the title says. They'll pick one side to hate, and the other side to like even more as "we have denounced the same leaders" is a bonus. A handful of civ 5 leaders were imported, but I’m surprised how many are alternate leaders rather than full civs that didn’t appear in 6. Some are counted twice for this reason. 558K subscribers in the civ community. After wondering what leaders were alive at the same time, I knocked this up for fun. Namaskaram, We are a friendly and user-focused community for Redditors from India. 157 votes, 96 comments. I agree, unless you are judging civs with multiplayer in mind, saying that someone like Portugal is inconsistent because what if you get lakes as y The subreddit for all things related to Modded Minecraft for Minecraft Java Edition --- This subreddit was originally created for discussion around the FTB launcher and its modpacks but has since grown to encompass all aspects of modding the Java edition of Minecraft. So many Domination bonuses. Also, is Apr 9, 2021 · In multiplayer, people regularly gang up against top-tier civilizations, so playing with an "inferior" world leader can reliably increase your victory percentage. I particularly like rapid expansion without a lot of combat, as it amuses me to just spread out like a blob, settling many times more land than the next largest civilization. If a leader’s lifespan fell within a century, no matter how briefly, they were counted. The easiest way to win a Cultural Victory is to align yourself with other leaders of a similar ideology. Battering Rams will still work against all walls, and your Cavalry can still benefit from them. Assyria's siege towers are amazing in groups of 2 or 3, and you can pair them with a couple composite bowmen to destroy other civilizations. Hi guys, im new to civ. Chief Pocatello (The Shoshone) is my favorite leader to play as. They both give some great options for civ 5 wins! 70 votes, 42 comments. Still like graphics and graphics style better of Civ 5. Neo-Bolivarism:: Can break trade agreements with other players at any point. Selecting contemporary public figures and determining which traits would they would have if they were included in Civ5 as leaders should be a funny exercise. With Civ 6 we have the Asset Previewer. If you want one from only the two main expansions, I'd say Maya have a decent advantage because their pyramids yield early science and their UA nets them an academy fairly early. It' Maya are 100% a top tier civ. Great designs from both gameplay and historical perspectives, usually great art, lots of love and care put into each custom civ. But some hefty bonuses on sea trades and naval battles would fit the theme. 1500s (9) Askia, Isabella, Suleiman, William, Elizabeth, Oda Nobunaga, Ahmad al-Mansur, Hiawatha, Gustavus Adolphus 1800s (9) Babylon, Korea, and Poland are almost always top 3 on any list. Soon after you build the UN, and every few turns thereafter, a world leader vote is held. choose the same location/browse/path Then in the Solution Explorer in Modbuddy I have a New Project with only the Mod. A subreddit for Civilization 5 Combat in Civ5 seems a little too easy. Do you spend too much time browsing reddit? You may already be part of the Adeptus Mechanicus. Babylon: Turns out being able to get free techs is pretty good. A subreddit for Civilization 5 We can get the ultra obvious ones out of the way early: Venice Portugal Both get huge, direct benefits towards gold generation. Super scientist and has tactical knowledge. Check the Civ 5 Customization Wiki has lots of information about how to make & use mods for Civilization 5. Considering that it's Barbarian Clans mode, there's a high likelihood that there would be many young city states for Georgia to profit from. Instead got into this low RAM (I suppose) problem again that causes leaders to T-pose and textures to not load. The Reddit home for Crusade and Narrative players for the Warhammer 40,000 (40k) tabletop game. I still remember my first time playing Civ 5, and the leader scene of Genghis Khan riding down on his horse had me completely stunned as I felt like I was immersed into that scene. IIRC: Two votes (for all civs) once the World Congress is founded One extra vote (for all civs) for each era beyond industrial - for example, if the world is in the atomic era, all civs have a minimum of four votes; 504 votes, 47 comments. My favorite game to date was a TSL large medeteranian game, just absolutely destroyed everyone easily, barely even needed artilery. There's a setting regarding cutscenes in the video settings. But as far as single-player gaming goes, these are the leaders who consistently win the most with the highest scores. MC for one is attempting to follow in the path of Sukritact and create animated leaders and lesser know civs such as the Olmec and Kanem-Bornu. Welcome all new and returning players to r/adeptusmechanicus, a subreddit where we discuss all things cult mechanicus and Skitarii legion (with some knights on the side), please look at our "admech resources" page before making a post and may the . Join us for game discussions, tips and tricks, and all things OSRS! OSRS is the official legacy version of RuneScape, the largest free-to-play MMORPG. I honestly don't usually have too much of a problem with him, he usually buckles under the weight of other AIs (I remember in one game he was actually struggling against Boudicca who isn't one of the strongest AIs let's just say). Order has a T-2 tenet that provides bonus tourism to other Order empires, and a T-3 tenet that gives bonus tourism for having more “Happiness” than your rivals. Even the post-roman/early medieval Germanic leadership is relatively hard to culturally pinpoint, as a unified german national identity didn't come around until the 1700s the earliest, and really as late as Bismark. If you're running the game on low quality, they won't play. Also of Ursa Ryan's evolution as an artist. So much that they resorted to goddesses like Amaterasu and fake female leaders like Nazca and Shakala. The science bonus from 4 cities with Pyramids (Shrines) is the same as Babylon's Academy. I like Shoshone, Spain, Babylon, Poland, Washington, and Korea. Hiawatha for being the most back-stabby and land-grabby motherfucker Ramalamadingdong for being completely hypocritical: he denounces you for being a warmonger but then declares war all the time. If you are elected leader of the world, you win. Notice how Civ4 had two leaders per civ while Civ5 only has one? No doubt there are multiple reasons for that, but the 3D leader heads are one of them. And… 549K subscribers in the civ community. Depending upon what your win condition is, I feel the strongest contenders are: Early game. That said, a lot of this contradicts what is commonly understood for English speaking civ 5 players. If your luck is not that bad, then a early 500 gold and settling along even one natural wonder is enough for S tier. This is a list of leaders present in Civilization V As somebody who follows Mesoamerican history and archeology, and even does some consulting on it occasionally with Youtubers and indie projects, honestly every Civ game has handled Moctezuma II and I pretty badly: the only game they've had proper Aztec royal headgear and dress, since in Civ 1 he had the Xiuhuitzolli turquoise diadem and a Tilmatli cloak (even if not a cloak color/pattern In any event, extraordinary claims require exraordinary evidence and all that. The worst case scenario is 5 extra happiness and 500 extra gold before Turn 60, that is already decent. While Assyria is encouraged to do early game warfare, their UA is functional throughout the whole game and it is ridiculously easy to stay #1 in literac I never really got into 6, sticking with Civ 5. The community for Old School RuneScape discussion on Reddit. A subreddit for Civilization 5 You're right about Eleanor, and she is a weird choice. 34 votes, 75 comments. " While Gandhi is one of India's most influential figures and people in India, as-well as one of the most important activists in India's independence movement, he was never the leader or the Prime Minister of India at any point in time or the leader of an army, contrary to other Civ 5 leaders. Jul 29, 2021 · As a leader in Civ, he is accordingly one of the most well-balanced military-centric leaders, coming in at number 7. A few of the dates are uncertain, so those are just faded. FWIW, even if your war ally doesn't attack with units, I'm (anecdotally) pretty sure that the strength of their military factors in to how intimidated the AI target is, so your AI victim may be more willing to go for a peace deal that involves handing over a city or giving you a lot of assorted shit. Tall means that your main focus is city development/wonder building/getting big populations in every city to plop down 4/5/6 different districts. No mention of Germany and free chance to convert Barbarians to units. Feel free… Some other options include Frederick the Great (he may have been a Prussian king, but Prussia effectively created the German state and he is a major historical German figure who has been used as a civ leader before) and Frederick II, Holy Roman Emperor (He may not be as well known as Barbarossa, but in some ways he was more powerful and successful), clearly Germany is swimming in dudes named They'll look to win via world leader votes in the world congress. We can't amass a huge navy (Harald), enormous army (Cleo), or vastly expanded territories (Trajan) that soon, and it's poor design to make these leaders hate us for such things so soon. 41 votes, 35 comments. Plus, it pads out the game length, haha. Mine is Alexander the great because he always forward settles me and backstab me every game and even one time he won one turn before i won a culture victory at the same time everyone was at war with me at the same time. Those statements all have point values — green ones are positive value, red ones negative — which add up to a “score” which determines how an AI “feels” about you. It turns every unit in Persia's army into a very strong unique unit. I do not agree at all with your judgement of Portugal and Assyria. My last win on King was a SV with Japan, where I was provoked into gobbling up The Huns' adjacent territory to the east (short of their capital, which Napoleon then took); and Venice's After that, Tamar's Leader Bonus grants an additional two envoys due to the City State following your religion. Get a Light Cavalry Unit with the Escort Mobility to move around the Battering Ram, and you can take down enemy Cities at record speed. You may also be interested in whoward's Pick'N'Mix mods, where you can find many useful mods not in the workshop, including templates for mod makers. I have played Germany and France, but those feel like boring leaders to play. The very fact that Korea gets DOUBLE secularism is insane, that is the primary reason why Korea is a god tier civ , so even one secularism is incredible in itself. 64K subscribers in the civ5 community. What I did was open Modbuddy; New Mod-Empty Mod-A new unique title. IMO the best leaders in the game are Jayavarman, Simon Bolivar, Pyotr (Peter), Hammurabi, Pericles, Frederick (only bc of Germany ability and Hansa, so Ludwig will probably be better), and Hojo (only bc of Japan ability, Tokugawa will probably be better). the thing is you don’t really go beyond 3/4 cities throughout your whole game. 248 votes, 55 comments. Have to agree with you ottoman choice there. Tell me why you especially hate that leader so much, it would be fun to read all your answers. I play Civ 6 because there is no corruption mechanic, this one really is awful in Civ 5 I have mixed feelings about districts and policy cards and don't like the world congress and some victory mechanics of Civ 6, also some weird leader choices. There's a certain number of votes you need in order to win the game, depending on game size. China is hilarious. The extra trade route on Political Philosophy (civic) and +2 gold/+1 culture on each internal trade route can snowball a game as it scales nicely as you found/acquire more cities. For instance, I’m surprised Pacal was imported as an alt leader for the Maya, but not Hiawatha leading a Haudenosaunee civ Diplomacy: your goal is to be elected world leader at the United Nations. Notice how Civ4 wonders got animated videos while Civ5 wonders get static images? Because they put that time and effort into the leader heads instead. Is there any better ones that you guys could… 178 votes, 29 comments. Art. true. Genghis Khan is one of my favorites. Mongolia, because keshiks. 22 votes, 37 comments. Would develop tech and military quickly. First thing I hate is any Civ whose agenda causes them to denounce me for things beyond my control on turn 20. A subreddit for Civilization 5 Members Online. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now r/civ5. Leaders (Civ5) Edit Edit source History Talk (0) Back to Civilization V Go to the list of civilizations. Then you get a free scientist at the first Long Count and now you have an Academy and the Pyramid science, meaning you have more science until Babylon can produce their next Scientist. I've managed to get a domination victory without building more than about 5 military units. I'm playing deity, turn 270, south Korea, science victory, and things could be going better, I'm a smidge behind in the space race. Anything by JFD (who has released more than 100 civs[!!!]) is typically regarded as being among the highest-quality of Civ 5 mods, and for good reason. 555K subscribers in the civ community. You can use denouncements against a scapegoat as a tool to generate a hugbox. I was able to find this articlethat talks about different leaders and their strengths. But I think most leaders/civ's (outside of the core set of all-rounder civ's) work best if you tailor the map to their strengths. Sejong of Korea (known in game as Do Yi)- 6/5/5 and rules from 1444 to 1450 -The second is that it affects AI leaders. 549K subscribers in the civ community. Of course, the +1 moment and 10% comabt strength during a golden age is incredible. The civ can have a military or culture focus depending on which leader they pick. That's my favorite way to win because I think it's the most engaging way to win. 65K subscribers in the civ5 community. Personally I think the whole leader thing is kind of gimmicky because they don’t actually change how you play the game in a very meaningful way. Our… The Ryukyu Civ is very fun. A subreddit dedicated to Sid Meier's Civilization, the popular turn-based series. A subreddit for Civilization 5 Great Leaders, I seek your counsel on how to win on Emperor, namely with a domination or science victory as these are the most appealing play styles for me. Ranking leaders and their phrases, as how they appear in the game script Augustus Caesar - First roman emperor "I found Rome a… It depends on what you are trying to accomplish. Personally, my top picks are the Iroquois because if the longhouse and their movement buff through forests, and Japan because of the Bushido attack thing, and the samurai and zero are both pretty A few reasons why it wasn't common in Civ 5 (1) With Civ 5 you couldn't preview 3D Leaders and animations outside of the game which was a pain for development and testing. I would read up on a guide about how the World Congress/United Nations works to understand how you get enough votes to win. Just bulk up on science, rush to advanced military technology, get a general and a few advanced units and you will literally roll over the enemy. The following four are pretty much entirely centred on cultural victory: Brazil (Has the highest end-game tourism potential of any Civ) Celts (The wide-builder's choice and the best pure cultural Civ at religion) I feel like this is the last time this question has to be asked, since a lot of the high talent modders have moved on to Civ 6. 312 votes, 24 comments. Other ones (mostly lookin at lategame gold, so ignoring stuff like Paper Maker and the various free temples): Civ 5 Wondering for a challenge, I want to use the single worst civ in Civilization V Edit: The consensus seems to be Iroquois, with Byzantium just as bad when playing higher difficulties Befriend him, Alexander is great ally if you're a competent leader, he will never fuck with someone as strong as him military wise, just be as strong and make friends with him, it's easy to do so. Thinking about it I definitely think secularism is up there. Our… Think of it less as like Helping you in the end game with being able to take like Commerce or something ass along side tradition rationalism and an ideology But more in the early game, pushing you that little further into tradition before anyone else Or letting you take that opener for rationalism as you get to reinessance Centuries with the Most Leaders. Same thing with Sumeria. Cheat Map Editor lets you change any and all tiles to whatever you like, so you can give yourself crazy natural wonders, wooded plains hills with spices everywhere and you can even build roads so your starting warrior can capture a neighbours settler. Persia w/ Satrapies. Also of Ursa Ryan's… Just started playing civ 5 and already fallen for it. Zheng Chenggong of Taiwan will be a controversial one with the Chinese government so I don’t think it will happen. Who is going to be the modern leadership? Gran Colombia: gotta go fast. Civ V aged nicely. Voidsingers is usually the best if you are trying to go for a faith based culture or religious victory, so its good for Civs like Khemer and Ethiopia, but also civs like Rome who can take advantage of its monuments to get a good faith income and pivot to culture, or use the faith to do other things such as use it for science and GPPs Really want to big up the Enlightenment Era mod, frankly bizarre that that stretch of history is so condensed/skipped in regular civ 5, and this does a great job of not only adding it in, but seamlessly making it's features work. A subreddit dedicated on the popular turn-based series, Sid Meier's Civilization. It also doesn't overrate tall empires ("tall is always better than wide" is the biggest myth of Civ 5). On average Spain is A+. They really did. All 46 leaders in Civ 5 are in an appropriately scaled up map (610 x 420 tiles by my guess) which is based off Earth IRL. Aztec are at least tier B, probably A. However, since Civ VII has been announced, I might as well give it another shot. Love the great turkish bombards. All I know of are: There are plenty of civs that are especially good for domination, but all-around, I'd say the best is Persia (my favorite civ). There's also Joseph Stalin for Russia in 1 and 4, Napoleon Bonaparte for France in 1, 4, and 5, Mao Zedong for China in the first four games, Catherine The Great and Isabella I both lead Russia and Spain respectively from 2 to 5, I could go on. This one deals with the best for domination. Both greek leaders are really great culture bull moose teddy is superb culture Both japanese leaders are great Nzinga is great culture and not bad at science Dutch are great, people see the polders which are great if you have the map for it, but their real strength is high adjacency campus, theatre squares, and industial zones. 539K subscribers in the civ community. In addition, some other big Civ names are Captain Lime, Merrick, Gedemo, Boom, and MC. xml file/folder I click Build-then Build the NewCiv. You can after that pay him to declare war on people you dislike, make him do your dirty work and he will do it with that smug on his face, no problem We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. Everyone knows the true sign of a great leader is a ridiculous hat, so I decided to make a tier list out of them. R5: playing the game on a brand new MacBook Pro with the M2 chip and 16 GB RAM so our beloved 13 years old game should have run smoothly. They all start where their nations capital or closest equivalent was in their prime. The above commenter is right to point out those diplomatic modifiers (“they covet land you own,” “we’ve denounced the same leaders”). I just want to know a few good suggestions to what leader gives the best bonuses near the start of the game. Andross: strong contender. The Caesar in Civ 5 is actually Augustus, not Julius (if I remember correctly Julius was in Civ 4). Your resources help you work your way to each of these conditions. These civs will spam a ton of cities all over the map usually forward settling you in the process. In my view, this is the best Civ 5 tier list I've found because not only does it have an explanation of their thoughts on every unique in the game, but it also doesn't underestimate the importance of conquest the way many other lists do. Our… I also recommend other ancient/classical leaders that have general development bonuses like Cleopatra, Trajan, and Pericles to early players as a means of learning the nuances of running a prosperous civilization before attempting the more specific agendas represented by leaders of the medieval/colonial eras. Aztecs: turn Raging Barbarians on and watch your culture advance. It is a one stop destination to discuss all the news, entertainment, science & technology, sports, history & culture, economy and geopolitics related to India. Jul 23, 2007 · Science Leader Korea and Babylon. Babylon and Korea because science rules all in Civ V, Poland because they get access to more policy trees, later policies in those trees, faster rationalism, and more ideology tenets. You see, in Civ2, they had a male and female leader for every Civ (except the Inca and the Arabs), but not every country had a real female leader to draw from, which is why some of the female leaders are either fictional/not really leaders. I was inspired by a timeline post on r/civ to find all of the Civ V leaders who ruled during the game's time span and see their stats. I made this for myself, so there may well be one or two mistakes in there. r/CivV: Civilization V subreddit one of. Who are your top 5 Civs/Leaders in civ 6? For example who would be the german ancient leader options. And on high settings, even PCs with plenty of RAM and good video cards tend to slow down around year 200. Unique Ability: Furor Teutonicus - Upon defeating a Barbarian unit inside an encampment, there is a 67% chance to earn 25 Gold and having them they join the Germans. I think the language barrier has caused civ5 strategy to silo and I think the cross-pollination is great. Civ 5 Leader Rant Brave New World I know there are the obvious pricks like Shaka, Trollface, Indonesia, and Miss Trade Agreement With England, but I just wanted to say - fuck Askia, so hard. myi gddmrww yisi gld azvoq gzgq iwygzj vahi fexub vgvhsju