Is silat effective reddit. Silat defensive techniques are extremely destructive.

Is silat effective reddit A Sub-Reddit for all things martial arts related Members Online • [deleted] Kali & the knife part of pencak silat are effective for sure. What I mean by safe is silat hit point are not above head and they also get points by disabling the opponent safely. Specifically, no head contact. > live and violent manner how effective Kuntao principles are. Many schools of Pencak Silat are basically just fantasy make-belief. Escrima or kali arnis is the right answer. Don't address other angles of attack. Because the whole of Pencak Silat isn't just an effective martial art, it's a dance and spiritual thing as well. The Karateka Fighter was by far the more powerful linear striker, and won. You don't need to mix another art with silat. Silat is probably the lesser of the four but I wouldn't necessarily say it's ineffective or bad, it's just very limited by the fact that it requires you to be very close to your opponent and can easily be countered by any martial artist who can extend the distance effectively and because any fighter worth their salt can do that it's a big problem. That's not to say that there aren't some unique things that silat has to offer, but the reality is that the vast majority of traditional silat systems are family systems that generally aren't taught to outsiders and that consist of movements that are generally not pressure tested and struggle against modern systems like boxing and wrestling. This one is famous for silat cekak I think. There’s also Kuntao Silat de Thouars which is a hybrid style created by Willem de Thouars, who’s also highly regarded. Silat’s ground game is mostly striking on/from the ground, but they do have a few submissions and a lot of interesting takedowns. BJJ, Muay Thai, Silat). I strongly recommend that you do not give up the Pekiti Tersia training. if Goju-Ryu is an effective self-defense art moreso than other kinds of karate, why are Goju-Ryu schools so rare? So like there are not a lot of Goju-Ryu schools for example in Los Angeles. Why silat specifically? If you're open to related arts there's plenty of decent FMA in London. They are members of the Kushan empire, the largest empire on the planet in Berserk, which lies to the east of Midland. Possibly look into some of the jkd, Silat and kali stuff. Both the use, way of wearing as well as the batik style print depend on the place of birth of the wearer both in a geographical way but also in a more social hierarchical way. Braililian Jujistu because so many fights end up on the ground. I practice Minangkabau Harimau of Hinafi lineage and Mande Muda of Suwanda lineage. Of course the correct answer is the better fighter, but if you had 2 clones the each with equal fighting skill I'd still say advantage MT because of the fact that it's a better style for Sport Silat. Fighter moves, and goes into a BJJ Guard with the left heel hook takedowns. Problem is when you criticize either you get one of two responses. Hawkbill blades have plenty of advantages over conventional drop points in certain tasks, especially in cutting fibrous materials. You apply it, and decide whether it's effective based on the outcome. Prior to his movie career Iko Iwais participated in sport silat, which is governed by IPSI (Ikatan Pencak Silat Indonesia). This is necessary because of how silat doesn't have you move your feet around a lot. Despite being "without form," jkd has become a very distinct combination of escrima/kali, bjj, wing chun, and silat. How moves, actions and counter attacks work. Aug 23, 2020 · Shanghai based MMA coach and Kunlun Fight ringside commentator Ramsey Dewey shares some thoughts on the Indonesian martial arts: Pencak Silat Silat is just a generic term for martial arts originating from the Malay Archipelago, like karate and kungfu. Is solar effective in terms of self defence or is it bull? Because in some of the ranking of martial arts videos it is ranked in the F tier but in videos of demonstration of Silat, it seems very effective. It would be great to distinguish what is competition non combat Silat from the real combat silat. I need to come up with an Action Plan so I can be most effective, I am nearly there I thought I could utilise some of your assistance. It's a devastatingly effective art, and Pendekar Sanders has spent years perfecting it after learning directly from a number of Pendekars in Indonesia. It's basically Muay Thai+ with headbutts, less rules, no points, and more brutally effective since no gloves are used. 285K subscribers in the martialarts community. Well, silat do involve lots of black magic bullshit. Beware of false equivalencies like "who would win between a Muy Tai guy and a Silat guy?" and the like. It has aspects s of point sparring with points for kicks and punches but you get even more points for takedowns and throws and you can even win by submission (though it's really hard within the time constraints) I've done Silat, Boxing, BJJ, and MMA. I do use Silat in sparring though, Silat has some really handy sneaky footwork and hip bumps to off balance and throw opponents that's really handy when paired with the thai clinch. I’m really interested in the origins of different martial arts and I recently watched a pencak silat seminar ( after watching the raid ) and noticed that a LOT of the movements and techniques are very similar to aikido, some are the exact same actually, theres a version of iriminage and a technique where your trap the hand and execute a wrist locks, this is most probably because both arts The disabling effects of Silat crits are quite effective for kiting. He had real combat experience that he utilized in his silat. Some styles of Silat are very sparring oriented, others are basically just aikido. Crypto We're also used to getting swept since it's so important in Silat. Unarmed stuff has some nice enough techniques, and at least some of them could work well (I sometimes use some silat takedowns (I learned them from taiji, but silat uses the same techniques)). Don't know much about PCK Silat. I believe the modality becomes effective for the practitioner when he / she understands the logic of this martial art. There's like one within reasonable driving distance of my house. Crypto A Sub-Reddit for all things martial arts related Members Online Finally completed the “pilgrimage” to the gravesite and place of meditation for my personal inspiration for martial arts: Miyamoto Musashi. Cheaper and less work than training yet it is far more effective. It's too inconsistent as a whole in training methodology (like kung fu) to be considered a reliable art. It's a beautiful martial art and I know people who have used bits and pieces of it to good effect, but as a whole system Silat doesn't have much sparring and the instructors tend to believe that everything they do is too deadly. Silat is like Kung Fu, there’s hundreds of different styles like Harimau and Serak. Practicioners focus a lot more on bela diri than seni although it has the nine rather nice jurus. Because of all this, silat is very different from your stereotypical Are streetlights dangerous and unpredictable? Yes. So his silat, absolutely. in the clinch or on the ground) which is why it's always good to learn a little bit of judo/JJ too. One of the beauty's of Silat is that the movements are very similar regardless of the weapon or no weapon in your hands, with the exception of a bo staff. Here for the comments. Saying that they are only weapons because Silat martial arts include them as a weapon is like saying that kukris are only weapons because the Gurka Rifles are equipped with them. Also, it depends on your goal: More effective for a fight vs. cimande. We're here to talk about all the… Magda was one of Inosanto’s top instructors and was at least partially responsible for injecting silat in to the core of what has become standard jkd curriculum. Not necessarily just in terms of winning but in terms of how the other style devolves in its presence. If the FMA lacks DB style sparring, or the KM isn't on an MMA base, skip all 3, and look for a 4th option. Muay Thai targets vital points. The defensive movements for punches seem also like the classic non-functional "arm neutralizations" and they don Someone also mentioned Burton Richardsons Silat. which ones are the hard ones? I will eliminate them from my future training to be most effective. It’s the main takedown in Silat, to the point where a lot of Silat matches are just people using strikes and clinch to set up kani basami. Assuming both methods are combat effective, the better fighter will win. 354K subscribers in the martialarts community. 303K subscribers in the martialarts community. Business, Economics, and Finance. Not only that but I don’t want to compromise my posture just to potentially damage someone’s toes. The guy in the trousers is the Silat guy, you can tell by his more open stance. Silat and the Tapasa are minor antagonists in the manga and anime Berserk by Kentaro Miura. It's great for self defense. People know what they're doing, they have endurance Business, Economics, and Finance. Well reddit sucks so I cant refer to your op on mobile. "pentjak silat" is not a style- its an extremely broad category encompassing hundreds of unrelated arts. The criteria for effectiveness in each are very different. A large person or athletic person can do a lot with it but if you're not athletic or significantly bigger than most people Silat likely won't work as advertised. i think there are at least 4 videos to be submitted throughout the course. Then there modern silat where the move already be change to accommodate the rule in MMA or any other comp but the downside are those move if compare to others races that are superior in physical those move are not effective enough to take down ppl. As for whether nunchaku themselves are effective, it really depends who you ask, so let's not get into that. And just accepting shots to the ribs because you're arm is in a certain spot. The stick-fighting was really fun. Silat is too diverse to really say. The key phrase you're using incorrectly is "And just accepting shots". Find the best posts and communities about Greco-Roman Wrestling on Reddit. That's why it's hard to know how the war will end. From my very limited formal JKD experience, you really have to find a good school with good instructors. silat is for combat or kill only situation, many moves are being barred in silat especially in silat sports competition because of its lethal applications, therefore it looks silly and dumbed down, hence why it is not suitable to adapted to sport, many of my friends has practiced silat which is not for competition, its completely different altogether, watch silat fight masters on youtube I always wondered because everyitme I see wing chun against other martial artists they get completely shited on but also at the same time in my gym there is one guy I see who really does it well against opponents and no not wing chun dosent fight wing chun guys he fight mma and boxing guys as well. The only and main reason silat gets attached to FMA most of the time is because of the use of some moro weapons like Kris, and Karambit, islamic, like Indonesia. There are actually silat combat fights on youtube (like karate combat) so you can judge for yourself. There are VAST differences in silat schools. Also, a pair of notes for OP, your punch will be fastest if its path is a straight line towards your target. They basically don't do head attacks with fists and concentrate on closing the distance as quickly as possible to grapple. I've been looking at Silat videos for a while and repeatedly I've noticed certain characteristics in the way they spar. Penchak Silat has a thing where you just step on a guys toes to screw with footwork. Silat's main issue is the unrealistic ruleset. Based on my experiences in the Bukti Negara and Mande Muda styles of Silat, every standup engagement leads to a takedown followed by striking your opponent while they’re down. As far as effectiveness goes, not particularly effective, but that’s to be expected from any art that lacks live sparring/competition and spends most of its training time on choreographed sequences. And when able, you need to spar. If your vibe is more to get out of melee range and regroup than to slice through a wall of rotting flesh, the extra block attempts kept me (and my armor Posted by u/KnifeEquipped - 6 votes and 7 comments panantukan is fma version of silat, so it's useless, you wont see so-called "gunting" (punch arm, limb destruction, defanging snake,) in real life, because punch in real life go fast and hard Reply reply I'd strongly recommend checking out Pukulan Cimande Pusaka Sanders Pentjak Silat, at www. In comparison to other disciplines, it can be considered "less effective"(e. in fact, Cheftain Datu Lapu-Lapu (our national hero) have confirmed to use the Eskrima to defeat magellan Business, Economics, and Finance. Both are combat tested and extremely effective. I had the privilege to train this week with an experienced student of both Silat and African aha-saki and they are very clever, alarmingly effective arts. FMA is more practical in application like Krav, Whereas Silat is more esoteric and spiritual like Taichi. It's unfortunately not cheap but it's effective and after all this upfront action I should only need to go like once a year for maintenance after Business, Economics, and Finance. He took from the other styles what is effective in real life situations and blended them together. From what I've seen it's more standing than ground. Most Silat seems to come in one of two forms, Sport Silat that looks similar rules wise to TKD with more sweeps, or "Deadly" Silat where one person pretty much stands there and lets the other guy hit him 30 times before being taken down by a small pull on the neck. Flexibility, athleticism, movement, practicality, and it just looks damn cool lol Silat demonstrations I've seen don't look like they'd work in a fight. Smith’s “Effective Greco Roman HEMA, WMA, savate, silat, capoeira The Perisai Diri style of silat heavily emphasizes serang hindar even going as far as making it their primary mode of competition. He was also a two tour Vietnam LRRP Ranger. Silat practitioners suddenly abandon Silat and just try to fight MMA style, often badly. I personally liked the technique the guy did in the video, but it isn't the only effective way. How can you test to see if something is effective? A. A Sub-Reddit for all things martial arts related Pay attention to how the P. What you find is that MMA just straight up dominates. Silat has the same problem as kung fu and karate imo, being a broad name for hundreds of unique styles and schools all doing different things, so quality varies wildly from shamanistic rituals passed down in rural villages, to Aikido like cooperative partner drills, to silat bebas being almost ameteur MMA. gym and ask politely for hard sparring. Some styles of karate are just better than others, likewise for Silat. 4. Most effective: Slugger and legend (majima) because of the weapons Second most effective: Beast, rush, legend (kiryu). He does some basic things like trips that obviously make sense (but are also in multiple other martial arts) I think there's some legitimacy to the "you need to train for situations that don't happen in the gym" argument, but training combat sports is still the most effective way to get good at fighting, because the intensity of combat sports is far higher than what you'll find in street fights. In my trial class of silat Panglipur Galih a pose looked a bit like this one, it wasn't quite a stance rather a movement you could throw in, the fist near the leg was supposed to protect the middle area, and with the "hammer" clenching, it was supposed to reduce the impact in case of a kick to the thigh. Silat is a conventional form of martial arts that hails from Southeast Asia, particularly Indonesia, Malaysia, and Brunei. I just stopped going because it wasn't worth the commute. However, there is often a core of truth in many principles. Sparring/stress-testing twice a week doesn't make you an expert in anything. fight match; More effective for MMA combat; More effective for self defense; Most effective in fight (1x1). Unlike taekwondo where the majority of the hit point is the head and almost all of it is kicking. The biggest benefit to eskrima is that most hand fighting martial arts such as boxing. the modules contain the videos and descriptions that’ll guide you through it. Depends on how much practical training you do would be the best answer I think. There is no clear picture and everyone use the generic term rather than branching and teasing out the combat forms from the competition forms which which is more like Wushu for public show rather than combat effectiveness. That's why I think Griffith can beat Silat, even if it's difficult. In fact many modern The style in short is very combative, most real Silat teachers will start you off with single Kali stick & progress to double, Kali stick & straight blade, Karambit then last empty hands. In Silat forms or Juru are often used and some knife applications are developed off of that. But balik lagi sih, mau pilih style apapun, check whether or not they do 'live' training where the opponents are actively resisting against each other. he asks It'll probably end up being closer to $1000 toward the end of my treatments as they say it's usually 6 treatments minimum for best results and most people need more like 9. " with short weapons: Silat Go on Youtube and look at "Silat vs MMA" videos FWIW. Many silat systems place emphasis on jurus (forms) and langkah (footwork), the idea is that these serve as a template, which can be applied independent of situation. Griffith will learn these weapons faster than Guts. The reason the world championships of silat are completely dominated by Indonesian, Thai and Malay says a lot about how silat is taught in the west. Sport Silat by itself won’t make you great at MMA, but if it’s paired with a great BJJ leg lock game, that could be the new meta for BJJ base fighters. You're just consolidating the skills that you've learned but it's not going to make up for a lack of knowledge or a fundamentally flawed foundation. he's not accepting a A friend mentioned silat at the MMA gym next to Richmond station, not sure when they train though. And that belief remained right up to the day UFC 1 dropped. back then Arnis/Eskrima don't look like the ones you currently see them as just sticks, they we're once 2 sharp blades which main purpose is to slaughter incoming colonizers in the ancient times. A Sub-Reddit for all things martial arts related of the human anatomy that are forbidden in other styles for being "too effective. There’s more of a focus on choreographed movements instead of actual sparring And every martial art targets “Vital points”. UFC 2 had a Spanish silat fighter who lost to submission against a Judo player, but his striking and groundwork were decent enough. Then again I’ve seen skilled competitors who go the bullshit route. We did some bjj-style rolling, but most of the ground-fighting we were taught was silat-based. Silat is another one that depends on who you get. It protects against surprise stabbings which no training can realistically protect against. Some focus on one more than another. I do recommend that the lengthy "researching period" be brought to an end. Silat, for the most part on it's own, isn't reliable for the streets. " You can go into any boxing, wrestling, BJJ, judo, kickboxing, etc. Personally, I like SBL because of how it opened me up. If you want my opinion on the most effective silat, its Serak. Silat and Griffith have similar fighting styles. This is a choreographed dance. This means you're not moving a whole lot. When people ask me about either of the arts I always recommend that the student know exactly what it is they want. Maul Mornie also does "Bruneian Silat" seminars in Wembley from time to time. Not much at all. The striking is silly but they’re masters of the cutback/kani basami which is a great takedown. More power will come from using your whole body with every punch, so practice using you hips and legs to help drive each punch, rather than trying to throw a full force punch from your arm each time. A good example where this is NOT the case is At the end of the day, your best defense is avoiding the altercation altogether, but if you’re looking for effectiveness, I’d recommend starting with the path that offers the most effective techniques for self defense first and then fill in the gaps later with Kali. Done it for 2 years. They are also a members of the Bākiraka, a particular tribe within Kushan that were left without a homeland centuries ago and have subsequent Yes biting is effective against someone using BJJ against you, if you bite and mean it”really chop down to take a piece of their flesh off” they’ll be in so much pain they’ll immediately stop doing their BJJ moves and then you escape, but if they already got you in a hold, don’t bite down, not worth the risk I can't really recommend Silat. Arnis has existed for centuries and proudly our national martial arts here in the Philippines. Hello all Redditers ! I plan to mix BJJ with Qigong, Silat and Kicking Boxing principles while taking up these classes multiple times per week with weighted gym. Bagua is a pretty legit Kung-fu style and has a good track record of producing good fighters. But that's where Muay Thai fills in the gaps. Tristan was hell on wheels. For example you'll find that an effective jab is more or less the same whether or not you're doing boxing, muay thai, kyokushin, silat or whatever. But that’s perfectly fine, as not every martial art has to be effective for fighting It is an attempt to discover what is most effective for you, regardless of where you learn it, what "style" it is, or if the populous supports the idea. I am trained in martial arts such as taekwondo, jiu jitsu and a little on kobudo weapons such as nunchakus and tonfas, but I am recently interested in carry a karambit knife for self-defence purposes due to its size easy to conceal. You need to find a good school. Its techniques encompass various skills, such as grappling and striking, involving weapons, including knives and sticks In silat olah raga, the sparring stops and resets if someone performs an unsuccessful ground attack like a scissor or sweep. The dance-like motions of Silat proivide the base for an explosive style of fighting that features super fast strikes and manipulation of balance and destruction of limbs. Hello all Redditers ! I plan to mix BJJ with Qigong, Silat and Kicking Boxing principles while taking up these classes multiple times per week with… Practiced Silat with the Magda Academy in CA, worked out at Gleason Boxing gym in NYC. Reply reply More replies More replies More replies Posted by u/Baabaaer - 7 votes and 12 comments Silat is different from FMA. com. Beast because you’re using you’re environment and heavy strikes coupled with some grappling. And I suspect the silat practitioners who have combat experience are probably more able to understand combat than anyone who just did MMA. Pencak Silat ( and Kuntao) are great arts and all of them can get you where you want to go. You’re better off training Muay Thai more imo. This also aligns with their philosophy of "Pandai silat tanpa sakit" or "Master silat/defend yourself without getting hurt". S. Speaking from experience with both, Muay Thai is MUCH better for self defense while Judo is still a good option but needs some cross training, preferably in either boxing or Muay Thai, to really make it effective "on da streetz" since it doesn't have a punching defense. Aha has a very circular, even festive look that could easily be mistaken for a dance, although is singlemindedly focused to maim and kill. Silat tends to start with empty hand and knife, Escrima the stick. There is a ton of diversity in Silat…it’s like kung fu in that regard. thanks for this. I have switched schools and styles and found a lot of schools teaching Pukulan-style silat which is fun and a great for health but not so for effective sparring (tanding) or self defense (bela diri). Any of the high damage polearms will get through armor just fine. I think arts like Silat can offer some interesting insight and give you ideas of possible options but the training is largely compliant so you learn a lot of techniques without the attributes to pull them off on a resisting opponent. Machetes are my go-to melee, and Krav Maga seems to make them exponentially more effective with very few bells or whistles. Jul 15, 2014 · First off, Is this an accurate representation of Silat? I mean the techniques used, nothing else. Your opinion that they’re useless is wild and stupid though. My personal opinion is that Silat's not a competition art, it's not built for it. A knife fight in which one person is mostly immune to being stabbed in the body is an extremely unfair fight. Penjat silat is excellent. A Sub-Reddit for all things martial arts related From what I've seen, if you have the right Capoeira teacher, it can be effective, especially if you complement it with other arts (e. Both terms Arnis and Silat are blanket terms for hundreds of arts so they can vary widely from one to the next. They get into a traditional art and don’t realize what is lacking to build effective fighters and they embrace the same compliant training as the TMA have been When used in pencak silat the sash is used to trap and ensare, but it is not prominently used in al styles. Second off, I know Silat is a rather offensive art, but does it use techniques such as Jabs (Boxing) to set up? Apr 17, 2006 · Aside from reservations considering the challenges of Harimau, all the possibilities are good ones. Stop being so close-minded. Silat largely lacks the training methods needed to make its techniques effective. Lastly, a lot of Malaysian silat focuses on ground takedowns, again because that's the most effective way of keeping your balance while finishing off your opponent. Crypto That’s the thing about a lot of TMA it takes someone with some competitive experience to make them worth while. The curved handles make them extremely secure without taxing the grip, and they can be held in a way to increase the "effective" length by dropping the hand down to the curve shape, without needing to make them less handy for general purpose cutting tasks. May 4, 2020 · The reason behind this is because Silat is such an effective Martial Art for self-defence. I can teach any martial artist 6 easy to do eskrima disarms off of 6 common attack angle that are most effective or I could show you the flashy stuff that won't save your life in a real scenario but looks really impressive. Silat defensive techniques are extremely destructive. The one thing that Capoeira seems to develop well is the ability to move in very quickly from outside or a prone position, which can translate well into a clench and/or takedown. I studied silat primarily for several years and in my experience in an empty handed fight a silat player doesn't have very many good answers to leg kicks. Many Silat systems come with specific ways of thinking (Petua) which they practice in their day to day lives. Knowing how to move efficiently, knowing how to generate the maximum power in a strike or turn someone grabbing you into an effective hold or submission, how to block or dodge or predict strikes, and even just having better balance are all able to make a difference in life or death For fighting or self defence? No, Silat is not effective It’s mostly a performance art, not too dissimilar to Wushu. We're talking weapon martial arts here, and I think some people dont understand your point. That's another good one. Muay Thai is high effective open hand striking and almost nobody knows how to defend those sort of leg strikes . Or even that guy who tried to do Aikido vs MMA. I train Kuntao Silat de Thouars and I can verify it’s very effective. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. There are no bad weapon and even empty hand martial arts. THere are styles of silat that consider themselves to be deadly but are essentially unproven. Yes fighting off groups is very important for me as I believe martial arts have been designed for 1 - 1 efficiency and in a real fight against multiple occupants its not like the movies, especially when knives are involved. Silat to the Malay Silat practitioner is not something they practice a few days a week and forget the rest of the time. Qigong for the Energy principles 20K subscribers in the kungfu community. When sparring, focus on the basic techniques. @Sensitive-Rip-333 others have already said live sparring and pressure testing. If the guy is pushing forward really hard you need that step to remind new people to get their wheels under them before they can look to defend or escape. Very true, but keysi seems to do alot of elbowing to areas that I've haven't seen in alot of other martial arts that make sense to me. But honestly if it's not a life or death situation like a robbery with a weapon or getting jumped by thugs & getting your head stomped in then I would say MMA gives you the most tools to work with & some knowledge. Reply reply 5-Fishy-Vaginas This takedown is so dangerous it’s banned in judo, but it’s extremely effective. It is a mixture of Cimande, Cikalong, Sabandar, Serak and Madi or Kari. The problem with the L-block is that it works on the exact opposite principle as effective limb destructions. And rush is pretty much boxing which is good for street fighting Panglipur is a 20th century silat style developed by Abah Aleh on West Java. Weapons stuff is very stylised-dance and impractical. In short though, as someone with 12+ years in FMA it's generally not an art I recommend for someone interested in fighting ability and self defense. Similarities to the AK-47: -Cheap -Can be mass-produced -The basics are so easy you can teach a child to use it -You can arm a riot on a budget The downside is the lack of quick lethality, but that makes it ideal for low-level confrontation in law enforcement. I can understand this rationale for silat olah raga's point sparring, but I think in practice it leads to an overeagerness to use these techniques without understanding the setup needed to keep them effective. But this guy does know boxing kickboxing and Both are effective in actual situations. If you only practiced purely functional Silat, you'd have a good and practical basis that is quite viable. In other words, spar. For self defence I feel current day weapons defence training is a must, also as a smaller person learning every quick, dirty and effective strike and hold (lots of joint manipulation) could also be helpful Everything and anything manga! (manhwa/manhua is okay too!) Discuss weekly chapters, find/recommend a new series to read, post a picture of your collection, lurk, etc! Silat Buka Lingkaran, Is a comprehensive amalgamation of Southeast Asian Martial Arts as used by the ancient Satria. It didn't seem very effective to me tbh. It's nice that it's flexible enough to also work when you pull out a knife or whatever, but the heavier weapons are where it shines. I’ve done Silat and Brazilian jiu-jitsu. Crypto. Boxing targets vital points. Pretty messy fight though, wing chun guy had speed and occasional good bouts of aggression, but there was nothing to the silat. Yeah, all the pauses from his cooperative opponent. If you watched someone dance at a wedding you may say their silat is not effective, but in that context it isnt meant to be deadly- to show that would be considered rude. A Sub-Reddit for all things martial arts related Good luck and great choices for being combat effective. Pairing Pencak Silat with training in Brazilian Jiu-jitsu would be actually godd*mn effective. What's a real fight? I hear guns can be 100% effective in a real fight. This includes techniques of conflict resolution, interpersonal conduct, and much more. The technical skill of the practitioners in the video you linked is lacking or inconsistent. Stomping on foot would be weird personally because there’s just so many other things that I could be doing. They both have similar fluid movement patterns. How effective would you say it is in a fight or competition? 'Silat' is an umbrella term for a large number of martial arts (said to be over 1000) spread all over Not sure whether either of those are of any interest to you, sorry I don't know much about silat, other than there seem to be many silat styles that spend a lot of time low to the ground, doing quite stylised movements. which ones would you prefer and which one do you think is most effective in a street fight: Silat, Muay Thai For weapons, I'd have to say escrima sticks and nunchaku come to mind - while the flicking "jab" motion of the nunchaku isn't half as effective as films may want you to think, actual practical swings still look pretty damn cool. way more aggressive and fast paced. Like those who train kendo (sword), or kali philipino martial arts, penjat silat has it's place among the world's best weapon martial arts. Effective destructions tend to be more about acting to substitute the soft tissue your opponent hopes to hit with something denser than they're striking you with, to punish them for their efforts. If the place where you train gives you the opportunity to try what they teach you against a resisting opponent, you will see for yourself whether what they're teaching you is effective. There's probably also silat fighters in regional indonesian and malaysian kickboxing/mma leagues that have winning records as well. g. The Silat discipline accentuates the importance of being adaptable and having fluidity in movements, resulting in an effective self-defense mechanism. Agree w/ this. Q. A Sub-Reddit for all things martial arts related. I'll add that sport silat presents a unique venue for this. It's very different. Wrestlers and judokas frown upon it so you don’t see it much. The rattan stick is pretty decent as a weapon though. Muay Thai is frequently pressure tested, Silat is pressure tested rarely, if at all. Also, Contrary to popular belief, TKD is NOT "all fancy spinning kicks" Almost the entire first year is spent learning effective blocking and punching techniques. I believe it was Tai Chi that served as my favorite defensive style. A rear naked choke, repeated strikes to the head of an unconscious person or a host of other techniques available to an MMA fighter would be extremely effective ways of killing someone. Sprinting works best against a single attacker (cuz then you cant be flanked)and also when you have at least 1-2 seconds to realize what's going on before the attacker is in stabbing range, otherwise youll be sprinting with blood loss. The word “Satria” originates from the Sanskrit word meaning “Knight” or “Warrior”. Don’t know much about it but the more practical sparring you do the more effective it will be and the better you’ll be able to apply to the situation you’re in. For instance, ground and pound incorporates elbows to thighs, if your opponent covers up while you're punching on the ground you can elbow down into their ribs or stomach area to still apply damage while they're on the defense. This is a variant of pencak silat which was created in the post-WWII era as a way of promoting and unifying styles across the country, much in the way Taekwondo and Olympic style sparring came to be in the last 50 years. A Sub-Reddit for all things martial arts related The only reason MMA doesn’t result in death is because referees and corners are there to halt fights and prevent serious injury and fatality. Krav Maga or military hand to hand is the fastest to learn & most effective on the street. When translated to Muay Thai, some thing just easily cross over. Boxing is the easy pick imo It’s easy to learn all of it can be applied directly and you practice against resistance (ie a person and bags). As with all traditional arts, there are quality control issues, so it's common to find guys who don't know what they're doing or are teachi Posted by u/SelfDiscipline25 - No votes and 6 comments I don't doubt that there are some things they train that make combat sense, but it has a healthy sprinkling of bullshido on top. Asking someone to show effectiveness of their art shouldn't be viewed as an act of hostility or some kind of challenge to "deathmatch. So, while judo is the king of martial arts for self defense, sport Silat guys would actually do okay in a street fight. Silat never, I can't think of any situation that makes it good (some places will do Silat and DB style sparring, but not without FMA as well). In general I'd say pencak silat gives you a wealth of tools to dissect any martial art, but since starting Judo it's helped me to go back and broaden my understanding of pencak silat Reply reply I do love ITF tho, think it is a really good thing to learn and as effective as anything else. Not the fancy shit. But yeah the for of silat that provides sparring just looks like bad WT. There are actual silat competitions that are full contact. This comes from the tradition of silat requiring practitioners to learn more than just self-defense. the sync sessions are just basically sir checking in on your class. One of my old friends/instructors did silat since he was like 4 years old. Et cetera, et cetera. To your point, I have seen military/combat systema, and to you point, it looks pretty much like combat sambo with a few Chinese trappings in terms of some striking dynamics. Silat isn't great for fighting. The reason why Silat was able to resist Guts was because of Silat's different weapons. A humble community of practitioners of the Traditional Chinese Martial Art. His stuff was very practical and combat oriented. Anyway, everyone training and all the instructors believed what was being taught was super effective. I did not like that he did not teach to base first. hi! for penjak silat, we were tasked to submit videos doing the combination of punches, blocks, kicks, and whatnot. Silat is highly effective ground fighting as well if you want to stay closer to a Philippino like style, but it can be difficult finding a teacher. ofau yuofdhx ebzhjjy rocoa kenzk vcyo alstb dglf kpyx crce